<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Spread Internet Explorer &#124; Inflaming the Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com</link>
	<description>Inflaming the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:05:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What people say on Flock browser</title>
		<link>http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/what-people-say-on-flock-browser.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/what-people-say-on-flock-browser.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Web Browsers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In recent weeks, several folks have asked why Flock is building a browser, not an extension, and about our relationship to the Mozilla community.</p>
<p><strong>Jagan Mohan, Mozilla Web Developer </strong></p>
<p>The decision of Flock to build a whole browser on&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In recent weeks, several folks have asked why Flock is building a browser, not an extension, and about our relationship to the Mozilla community.</p>
<p><strong>Jagan Mohan, Mozilla Web Developer </strong></p>
<p>The decision of Flock to build a whole browser on Mozilla code makes perfect sense that I think this lengthy explaination is some what redundant.</p>
<p>The whole internet community is far from being homogenous and there are various whole large groups of users who use generic browsers for various sets of common purposes.</p>
<p>Thus the necessity for hundreds of browsers built around hundreds of core purposes is a reality.</p>
<p>One IE or Firefox won’t fit the needs of everybody.. although firefox tries to give the user the flexibility to extend and customise the functionality, it is far from perfect.</p>
<p>I think that a browser custom made for the blogging community like FLOCK for example would prove pioneering for others to take up to develop such niche browsers.</p>
<p>Hey, afterall, why can we install two or three browsers and use them all in diffferent situations?</p>
<p>I now have firefox, opera and flock installed and I use them ALL. There is no rule I see that I have to use just one and transfer ALL my loyality to it alone.<br />
<strong>Bart Rockman, web application developer in Texas</strong></p>
<p>One of the questions people are asking today is “Why are we releasing our code under the GPL, instead of triple-licensing it under the GPL/MPL/LGPL?”</p>
<p>The answer is that intellectual property issues are big complicated things that have critical business impacts. Areas to cover include: source code licensing, trademarks (securing trademarks, trademark usage policies), EULAs, third party partners code licensing, patents issues, etc. Dealing with all of these is a tremendous endeavor. I recall it taking many many months for the Mozilla Foundation to flush out its trademarks policy, for example. I suspect the discussions inside of Mozilla around the triple-licensing policy took many months as well.</p>
<p>The MPL made sense for Netscape in 1998 in view of their business outlook. It seems to work well for the Mozilla Foundation and the Mozilla Corporation. I’m not sure that it’s the right licensing scheme for Flock.</p>
<p>So we are taking things one step at a time when it comes to our source code licensing policies. We’ve already made a couple of big strategic decisions on the source code licensing front: (i) our code will be largely (maybe even entirely) open source, (ii) we’re putting it out to the world right now under the GPL, (iii) we’re asking contributors to assign copyrights to us. These steps mean that we are open source and provide us with the flexibility to evolve our source code licensing policies over time.</p>
<p>As I’ve indicated above, we are serious about working with the Mozilla community. As we work with folks at the Mozilla Foundation/Corporation and identify areas where it makes sense for our code to go back upstream, then we will relicense those pieces of code under the triple license.</p>
<p><strong>Kevin Nilson, Netscape admirer</strong></p>
<p>It’s interesting to read how everyone seems to define Flock in their own way (it’s just a browser; it competes with FIrefox; it’s only for bloggers and pic sharers, it’ll destroy the effort to gain marketshare on IE, etc.) I don’t do many of those things &#8211; I just want a browser to do what I want to do when I want to do it. I moved from IE to Firefox, to Camino before stumbling on Flock while reading about a plug-in to trick IE-only websites into thinking you were using IE if you visited with a Mozila-based browser (I needed to overcome MS Exchange Webmail’s bad habit of asking for a password for every iteration of an icon it was loading on a pageif you were using anything except IE). Even better, Flock soved the password demand problem without needing to install the plug-in. It seems faster and the toolbar customization organizes things to fly even faster still. Good stuff from an end user perspective. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/what-people-say-on-flock-browser.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNA Certification to get Private Duty CNA Jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/cna-certification-to-get-private-duty-cna-jobs.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/cna-certification-to-get-private-duty-cna-jobs.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>CNAs or Certified Nursing Assistants are in great demand. They are needed in almost every medical care facility. The CNAs are these medical persons who make sure that the ailing patients are properly taken care of under the supervision of&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNAs or Certified Nursing Assistants are in great demand. They are needed in almost every medical care facility. The CNAs are these medical persons who make sure that the ailing patients are properly taken care of under the supervision of the registered nurse.</p>
<p>Private duty CNA jobs in CT are highly challenging and demanding. Private Duty <a href="http://www.bestcertifiednursingassistant.com/license/cna-license/">cna license</a> in CT is basically handling a job as certified nursing assistants for the ailing patients, who are not admitted in the hospitals but at their homes. These patients demand for extra care and support. The nursing assistants perform various kinds of tasks and jobs for them. They are as follows :</p>
<p>•	Keep a keen eye on the nutrition and infection control.<br />
•	Checking the vital signs of the patients (temperature, blood pressure, pulse and breathing).<br />
•	Help the patients in bathing and grooming.<br />
•	Clean their room and change the bed covers.<br />
•	Constantly giving the medication reminders to the patients.</p>
<p>Though, one should keep in mind that the private duty CNA jobs in CT can availed only by these, who are qualified for the same. It demands one to devote lot of time and energy in serving the ailing patients. Nursing personnel must complete the state approved training program and clear the final <a href="http://www.bestcertifiednursingassistant.com/cna-exam/cna-exam-sample-test-questions/">CNA exam</a> (written and practical). After the successful completion of the CNA training, they receive the <a href="http://www.bestcertifiednursingassistant.com/cna/cna-certification-test/">cna certification</a>, which makes them eligible for any kind of certified nursing assistant jobs in the state.</p>
<p>According to the Connecticut Department of Labor, there will be around five hundred and thirty five job openings annually. This means, qualified and professional CNAs will be in high demand. The private duty CNA jobs in CT allow the CNA to earn $24,960 to $31,200 annually.</p>
<p>Apart from the private duties, a certified nursing assistant can also be positioned in hospitals, nursing homes, clinics, home health agencies and long term medical care unit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/cna-certification-to-get-private-duty-cna-jobs.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Internet Explorer 7 features revealed</title>
		<link>http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/more-internet-explorer-7-features-revealed.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/more-internet-explorer-7-features-revealed.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IE Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Browser enthusiasts, Internet Explorer and Firefox fans alike, were pleasantly surprised when Internet Explorer 7&#8242;s new features were shown at Microsoft&#8217;s Community Technology Preview recently.</p>
<p>&#8220;I honestly don&#8217;t see why anyone would want to use Firefox,&#8221; Steve Ballmer is reported&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Browser enthusiasts, Internet Explorer and Firefox fans alike, were pleasantly surprised when Internet Explorer 7&#8242;s new features were shown at Microsoft&#8217;s Community Technology Preview recently.</p>
<p>&#8220;I honestly don&#8217;t see why anyone would want to use Firefox,&#8221; Steve Ballmer is reported to have said, &#8220;especially considering it was programmed by a group of people you can&#8217;t trust.&#8221;</p>
<p>Internet Explorer 7 will sport several new features that we haven&#8217;t seen in Firefox yet:</p>
<p>* It has been confirmed that we&#8217;ll be seeing a phishing filter in IE7, this just helps prove that Internet Explorer is the safest, most user-friendly browser that there is.<br />
* We also saw an exciting new technology called &#8220;Quick Tabs&#8221; which should increase the productivity of tabbed browsing compared to Firefox&#8217;s implementation. This allows you to view previews of each tab realtime.</p>
<p>Users can even set a tab group to open automatically every time they launch Internet Explorer from the Start menu, to have just the pages they want open ready for them as soon as they open the browser.<br />
* Increased security, of course. That doesn&#8217;t mean Internet Explorer wasn&#8217;t bulletproof before, but as new types of attacks are developed Internet Explorer expands to fight against these types of malicious activity. As an example, the ActiveX technology which for some reason angers Firefox fans so much is now an &#8220;opt-in feature&#8221;.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot more than this going on behind the scenes, for example printing support will be far beyond anything you can ever imagine. Steve Ballmer was happy to point out at a recent press conference that he would &#8220;crush Firefox with his own feet&#8221;, a promise that we are sure he will keep.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s all for now, remember, Spread Internet Explorer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/more-internet-explorer-7-features-revealed.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox 1.5 Release coincides with uncovering of terrorist plot</title>
		<link>http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/firefox-1-5-release-coincides-with-uncovering-of-terrorist-plot.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/firefox-1-5-release-coincides-with-uncovering-of-terrorist-plot.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox Bugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The 9th of September this year was a sad day for us all. Not only was Mozilla® Firefox™ 1.5 beta 1 released, but a shocking terrorist plan was unveiled in the Southern Asian capital.</p>
<p>For many of us, this does&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 9th of September this year was a sad day for us all. Not only was Mozilla® Firefox™ 1.5 beta 1 released, but a shocking terrorist plan was unveiled in the Southern Asian capital.</p>
<p>For many of us, this does not seem like a coincidence. Not only the proximity of these two events, but the proximity of these events to September the 11th. I hesitate to touch upon such a controversial topic, but I feel a conspiracy of such magnitude cannot be ignored.</p>
<p>Ask yourself this &#8211; will you stand idly by and watch as these terrorists destroy our country?</p>
<p>In itself, the release of Mozilla® Firefox™ 1.5 Beta 1 is devastating. This release of inherently unstable and buggy software (which is what we have come to expect from open source projects) will cause a wave of browser crashes, dramatically decreasing productivity. I can only pray for businesses that have strayed from the Microsoft® faith; for I suspect their productivity may decrease exponentially.</p>
<p>The unstable version is purported to crash each time the browser is closed. Talk about bugs! Even N******e never did that!</p>
<p>If this is an attempt to crash the economy, I can only hope that it does not work. God help us all.</p>
<p>Spread Internet Explorer &#8211; your country depends on YOU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/firefox-1-5-release-coincides-with-uncovering-of-terrorist-plot.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bye Bye Avant Web Browser?</title>
		<link>http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/bye-bye-avant-web-browser.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/bye-bye-avant-web-browser.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Small Web Browsers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>One Technical expert from Technocrati predict the fast death of Avant Web browser. He wrote:</strong><br />
I have been a faithful Avant user for several years, but I think no more. I have just installed SlimBrowser. Unless I am missing something,&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>One Technical expert from Technocrati predict the fast death of Avant Web browser. He wrote:</strong><br />
I have been a faithful Avant user for several years, but I think no more. I have just installed SlimBrowser. Unless I am missing something, it does everything Avant does, and more. Especially the fully customizable toolbars, with the system buttons where I want them.</p>
<p>So for now, it&#8217;s Bye, Bye Avant. It&#8217;s been nice knowing you. Maybe I&#8217;ll be back some day <img src='http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><strong>SpreadIE editorial team shares its ideas about future of small web browsers. </strong><br />
SlimBroswer is attractive, indeed, but it sadly does not do &#8220;all that Avant does&#8221; in every nook and cranny&#8230; but one major example is that it does offer what appears to be multi-threaded operation, etc.</p>
<p>From what we and many others here in the Enclave have seen over a years time with both browsers, both could stand to learn a bit from each other &#8212; examples being that ieSpell is better &#8220;integrated&#8221; into Avant than in the current SlimBrowser, and SlimBrowser&#8217;s implementation of auto-fill / form fill seems &#8220;differently weird&#8221; compared to perceived easier way that Avant does it, etc.</p>
<p>Since we do a lot of all manner of work and web sites, podcasting / videocasting, support, etc., just to note, we do run Avant, SlimBrowser and Firefox, all installed, and it is interesting to see each one (or two or three!) in operation, in order to compare and contrast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/bye-bye-avant-web-browser.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How can I restore Pop-up Window Blocking in Netscape 7.0?</title>
		<link>http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/how-can-i-restore-pop-up-window-blocking-in-netscape-7-0.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/how-can-i-restore-pop-up-window-blocking-in-netscape-7-0.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 13:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Netscape]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Applies To: Netscape 7.0PR1 &#038; 7.0 final; Windows 95, 98, NT and 2000</strong></p>
<p>This feature, along with the Image Manager can be restored by simply installing<br />
the xpi file located below. This file will make the appropriate changes to&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Applies To: Netscape 7.0PR1 &#038; 7.0 final; Windows 95, 98, NT and 2000</strong></p>
<p>This feature, along with the Image Manager can be restored by simply installing<br />
the xpi file located below. This file will make the appropriate changes to your<br />
prefs.js file that will allow the options to return to the UI under<br />
Edit | Preferences | Advanced | Scripts &#038; Windows. You will need to restart<br />
Netscape 7 after installing the xpi file.</p>
<p>Download, unzip to a known location on your local drive. Open Netscape, then &#8211; File -> Open File and<br />
browse to the location of the adBlocker XPI file and open it. This will install the file.</p>
<p>NOTE:Does not work in 7.02 as it already has this feature built in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/how-can-i-restore-pop-up-window-blocking-in-netscape-7-0.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How do I Get Rid of &#8216;AutoAdmin component can&#8217;t be loaded&#8217; on Startup?</title>
		<link>http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/how-do-i-get-rid-of-autoadmin-component-cant-be-loaded-on-startup.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/how-do-i-get-rid-of-autoadmin-component-cant-be-loaded-on-startup.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 13:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Netscape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips & tricks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Problem Symptoms</strong>: &#8220;Every time I open Communicator, I get this error: &#8216;The local configuration file specified a configuration URL, but the AutoAdmin component can&#8217;t be loaded.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Operating Systems</strong>: Windows 3.x, Windows 95, Windows 98, and Windows NT.</p>
<p><strong>Solution:</strong></p>
<p>This error&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Problem Symptoms</strong>: &#8220;Every time I open Communicator, I get this error: &#8216;The local configuration file specified a configuration URL, but the AutoAdmin component can&#8217;t be loaded.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Operating Systems</strong>: Windows 3.x, Windows 95, Windows 98, and Windows NT.</p>
<p><strong>Solution:</strong></p>
<p>This error will normally occur when you previously had a customized Professional Edition of Communicator installed, then upgraded to a Standard Edition of Communicator, which does not include the AutoAdmin component.</p>
<p>To fix the error, you can either install the Professional Edition or download a base netscape.cfg that does not try to use AutoAdmin functions.</p>
<p>To download and install the Professional Edition, go to Netscape&#8217;s software download page. See also Section 3, Number 14 of this FAQ for installation tips. Please Note: If you are using a customized Netscape as part of a business local area network or a similar setup, you must install the newer Professional Edition to avoid losing customizations. See your organization&#8217;s system or network administrator or IS/IT Support for more details.</p>
<p>The quick fix for this problem is to download a plain netscape.cfg file. Download this file, then close Communicator, open File Manager or Windows Explorer and go to your &#8230;\Netscape\Communicator\Program folder and rename netscape.cfg to netscape.cfx. Next unzip the file you downloaded to the same directory and restart. Please note that choosing this option will cause you to lose all customized features. If this is unacceptable, download the full Professional Edition as shown above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.spreadinternetexplorer.com/how-do-i-get-rid-of-autoadmin-component-cant-be-loaded-on-startup.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

